by Kate
19. February 2010 10:10

While it is possible to create artificial intelligence that can almost simulate a chess game and contend as a formidable opponent, it is not so easy to do this when it comes to creating online poker games. While computer chess games are closer to the real deal than computer poker, it’s still being criticized for failing to completely simulate human thought, as well as for not developing since the 1960’s and 1970’s. Garry Kasparov, the chess grandmaster who has won and lost games against computers and human beings, says that if programmers really want to grasp and master human thought, the game of poker would be better suited in assisting them.
He goes on to explain that while chess is a 100 percent information game in which both players are 100% aware of all the data all the time, poker comprises of hidden cards and variable stakes that create opportunities for chance, bluffing and risk management. These entirely human aspects of poker might not be able to be formulated into a system that can accurately simulate real poker play. The ‘human’ aspect of poker will perhaps make it an extremely unpredictable game. While there is constant research into poker odds and variables, poker will never be ‘black and white’ or to be defined.